AaronL wrote:
Explain more clearly the following as they relate to our hope in Mary:
1. "Her being the personification of the Church"
She is the daughter of the Father, the mother of the Son, and the wife of the Holy Spirit.
She is what a human person ought to be in relation to God(Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) par excellence.
She preceded all others in faith and is in all things the closest disciple to her Son.
AaronL wrote:
2. "her intercessions" --probably this one is self explanatory so you don't need to explain this one.
There are some considerations involving Biblical Theology which involve the her role as an intercessor. It involves an office in the Davidic Royal court, that of the Queen Mother.
AaronL wrote:
3. "the graces she receives from Christ"
Since Mary is the personification and the ultimate symbol of the Church(or the "New Israel"; cf. Rev 12), she is
the "body of Christ and individually a member of it." She with the other saints in communion with Christ in heaven dispense the grace of God to those in the Church by the direction of God.
E.g.: I am a father. I have various gifts to dispense to my children. I could just randomly hand out the gifts or just leave them out for them to pick through on their own.
Or, I can give them to my wife who knows which gifts would benefit which child the most.
Now I know that this example is not perfect in relation to the subject. But it is evidence of a very simple idea,
that it does no offense to the Father for His spouse or others to dispense the gifts which He provides for His children.AaronL wrote:
4. "the promise of with her being glorified, body and soul, by God"
Her actuality is our destiny. We should want to be as she is. She is proof that we can trust God in all things as well as proof of what that promise fulfilled is: the complete renewal of our bodies and souls by divine grace. That a life of faith and cooperation with grace through humble obedience to Jesus is not merely a "pipe dream" unattainable except for a few.
AaronL wrote:
Also, what if Mary was given the protestant emphasis? What would I be missing out on in these specific points that you have made?
Frankly to me protestantism is not merely an "emphasis" but a whole separate issue with its own soteriology.
What has been shown to me in discussions with other protestants and their objections about Mary is that it inevitably leads to them denying essential things about Jesus, namely regarding the Incarnation.
E.g.: Her title "Mother of God". Evangelicals I encounter always balk at this. They say things such as "she is the mother of Jesus the man" or "she is only the mother of his humanity/human nature," or that "God cannot be born."
Now, aside the fact that mothers do not give birth to "natures" but to persons, what they are essentially saying is that Jesus was not truly divine, despite the virgin birth.
They have no problem though, OTOH, in proclaiming the Jesus as God died on the cross at Calvary.
The relationship between Mary and Jesus, and the necessary link their relationship has in regards to the doctrine of the Incarnation, always exposes a falsehood someone has in their understanding of Christ.
It is as she proclaimed at the Annunciation: "My soul magnifies the Lord..."
AaronL wrote:
You have to understand that I do not put any hope in Mary at all. I am thankful for her. I believe that she is also a believer who is in heaven. But, I don't understand any need for veneration of her. So what am I missing out on? This is a serious question to me. Thank you for taking the time.
Throughout all of John's gospel he uses a literary device by never referring to himself by name, but by merely referring to himself as "the beloved disciple."
The purpose of this is to allow the reader to place him/herself in the place of John as that beloved disciple.
During that pivotal point at Jesus' crucifixion, John records this(John 19):
[26] When Jesus saw his mother, and the disciple whom he loved standing near, he said to his mother,
"Woman, behold, your son!" [27]
Then he said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother!" And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home. There is something too significant in this command, that it was Jesus' last command while hanging on the cross, suffering terrible pain and agony, dying of asphyxiation because of the fluid filling up his lungs and chest cavity, where every word said costs Him life, that He would issue these words as some of His final words, that he would command "the beloved disciple" to take His mother into his home.
That said...