GKC wrote:
You are correct about his method of writing. ST. THOMAS AQUINAS is the most famous example. He wrote it off the top of his head, for about half the book. Then, deciding it might need some thickening, he sent Dorothy Collins to town for a few books on the Good Doctor. Read over those, set them aside, and finished dictating the book. Lack of editing or re-writing resulted in such things as the lines of non- Browning poetry, in the book on Browning. As I often say, one doesn't go to Chesterton for scholarship, or precision (only 3 dates, IIRC, in his HISTORY OF ENGLAND), but for insight and understanding.
I heard that a reviewer pointed out that that book had only one date, and it was wrong. But this might have been in reference to Belloc.
GKC wrote:
On speeches, you are right in principle. But he was also known to scribble cryptic words on random scraps of paper, dig them from his pocket, and proceed to orate.
A guy like that just doesn't have time to stop and do footnotes or make a bibliography - his mind is simply moving too quickly. I've heard it said (by contemporaries who want to classify every kind of genius as being some sort of syndrome) that Chesterton likely had Asperger's (mild form of autism). He was like Mozart, who just transcribed his music straight from his head to the manuscript paper with hardly a change or an erasure. They say his manuscripts are immaculate, whereas Beethoven's are blotted with many scratchings-out and revisions and marks of angry frustration. For Beethoven composition was grueling work accompanied by much self-doubt. For Mozart it was a lark.