Good Afternoon, All--
I fear I inadvertently gave the wrong impression in my effort to keep the opening post brief and focused on the issue of what to tell Brit about being harassed for her devotion.
When I found out that the attacker was back in school Thursday, I jumped the chain of command right then. Part of that problem was, I think, a conflict of interest on the administrator's part. While speaking with him Friday, he assured me that he knows the girl's mother "very well" and is certain that she won't tolerate that kind of behavior out of her child. (If that were the case, the kid wouldn't be behaving like that to start with, but I digress.) So I called the head principal and got Brit's core teachers involved, and the girl was removed from the classroom sometime Friday. But half a day's suspension is far from adequate punishment, and that's what I meant by waiting to see what the punishment will be. If it is not sufficiently harsh, I'm going to the district level and if they won't take care of it, I'm going to the state level. My husband works for a state legislator so I'll ask him what steps to take.
In the meantime, I have the core teachers (with whom Brit spends most of the day) on board. All four of them were mad as wet hens Friday (when the threatening note was found) and I really think they'll do whatever it takes to make sure Brit is not physically harmed again. I wouldn't be at all surprised if their actions were the catalyst for removing the girl Friday. The frightening part is, who knows what this nitwit child is planning. ...?
I spoke with the Sheriffs Department on-site officer Wednesday. He said that the normal procedure for this kind of thing (without the threat) was to write it up with a recommendation to dismiss and send the report to the solicitor's office. If it happens again, the solicitor will press charges. First thing Monday morning I'm going to get with him again and find out if and/or how the threat changes his normal procedures. As far as I can tell, the solicitor's office won't press charges at this stage because it isn't sufficiently severe, as in Brit was not seriously injured.
LiveBy--Funny you should mention the Constitution. I was making those same points Friday to the discipline principal. And I think I need to allow the school to do the right thing before I let fly with the lawyers and such. But if they don't, I have every intention of making a terrible fuss.
Lisa--

Most people tell me I need to do more to contain my mama bear instinct. But never fear, I'm not taking this lying down.
Dawn—I couldn’t believe the kid was back Thursday either. I really think there’s a conflict of interest issue at work here that explains why she was back.
Dawn, Cathaholic and Pythia—Brit is a typical 13-year-old in a lot of ways. All you need do is look at her bedroom for evidence!

But she is extremely devout, and in that many people have told me she is not typical. Take Lent, for example. Last year, she thought that fasting applied every day, so for two weeks she ate once per day. I had to get the priest to tell her that fasting was for Ash Wednesday and Fridays only, and even then she was reluctant to quit. She gave up the telephone for Lent in 2001. I was admitted to the hospital during the third week and she wouldn’t get on the phone to talk to me until one of the deacons told her that in that circumstance it would be okay. God is at work in her.
Catholic Defender—Believe it or not, we are firmly ensconced in the “Bible Belt.” If things are not adequately resolved, I’ll give you our stats and you can call O’Reilly.
Catholic Cadet—The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that the DRE was focused on how to lessen Brit’s suffering, and quite frankly the easiest way would be for Brit to stop displaying her devotion. Initially I agreed but like I said, the more I think about it the more I think she should be allowed to practice her faith without interference.
Custos—I left work Wednesday and went straight to the school. The principal of discipline (I guess he’s kind of like a vice principal) told me that he hadn’t been able to reach the other girl’s parents. I don’t know if I believe that or not in light of the conflict of interest issue. Monday morning I’m going to get with the head principal and the sherrifs department again and find out how the threat changes the equation (they were all gone by the time I got there Friday.) Also, I don’t think Athanasius meant for Mitch to go down and beat anyone. Fact is, men are more likely to take other men seriously, whereas mothers are dismissed as “hypersensitive.” Problem is, Mitch doesn’t communicate verbally very well, especially when he’s angry, which is why I generally deal with things like this.
I have a friend in the talk radio business here, and I know the executive secretary for the local paper’s editorial department. If I don’t get some serious action, I’ll go to them for help. But I want to give the school a chance to do right first.
Please, everyone, keep Brit in your prayers. She’s got a lot of courage, but she’s still just a kid and I worry about her.
Thanks so much, and keep the good ideas coming!