Please watch if you do not fully understand. Many are confused or deceived on the subject.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P19gczQoYts&t=4s

Like you?

Interested people want to know --

will he return and talk?

Oh, he's a newbie to YouTube. 23 total views, including mine.

Shouldn't this be in the Apologetics forum?

When is the first set of games? I thought that college was starting this coming weekend???

not sure what being born again has to do with the college football season but all the games we picked are not this saturday, but next saturday, on the 2nd

Did you hear about the Catholic wheelchair basketball team? They're called the Holy Rollers.

of course they are

Only you could properly get away with that joke, Wheels!

Did you hear the results of the last Ecumenical conference? Catholics can eat meat on Fridays, Jews can eat pork, and Baptists can drink in front of each other.

Random Youtube clip: "Baptism does nothing but cleanse the skin with water…"

St. Peter, 1Pet 3:21: "Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body…."

they so hate to have bible verses contradict their erroneous thinking ... but of course, the 1 Peter quote does not really mean what it plainly says

That would only be a meaningful critique if you yourself actually believed what the Bible plainly says. But since you don't, well, you know . . . kettle, meet pot.

So says the Protestant who holds to his own private interpretation of the Scriptures. back atcha.

you mean my understanding differs from your understanding????1 well, color me shicked!!!!!!!!111

Yet if you invoke that defense, then so can the author of the OP. My point is there's a bit of tu quoque going on, along with the idea that your objection undermines itself, which is a shame, because there is quite a bit of legitimate objection to in that foolish video.

And your objection would only have force if you held to the perspicuity of Scripture, which you don't. Now, if you want to concede that issue to me, then maybe we'll make some headway in getting you to give up some of your ridiculous attempts to justify some of your even more ridiculous ideas about such things as you've been corrected on on more than one time on these boards. At least I don't pretend like the history of interpretation is important except when it suits me, unlike you.