The Catholic Message Board
http://forums.avemariaradio.net/

Is Harry Potter of the Devil?
http://forums.avemariaradio.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=169068
Page 2 of 5

Author:  ForeverFaithful [ Wed Sep 26, 2018 10:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Doom wrote:
ForeverFaithful wrote:
Fr Amorth and Fr Ripperger have both called Harry Potter of the devil


Fr. Amorth was the Catholic Jack Chick, you'll need a more credible source than that.


Fr. Amorth was an active exorcist, if anyone going to know about demons, would it not be him?

Author:  gherkin [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 6:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Like I said, even the world's greatest physician can't diagnose someone he knows nothing about. It doesn't know matter how much he knows about health and sickness. You've got to know the patient, too.

Author:  JarrettM [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

You're so right, Gherkin. Isn't "you can't diagnose someone you haven't met" or something along those lines one of the rules of the trade, so to speak?

Author:  Bombadil [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Some people just call any story involving magic demonic. Harry Potter is essentially a story of good vs evil. Not all that different from any other. If anything is demonic in the story it is the representation of the antagonist. Which really makes the gist of the story quite the opposite of being demonic.

Author:  GKC [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Wait.

gherkin was ....right?

Or ...who is Gherkin?

Author:  Obi-Wan Kenobi [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 8:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

ForeverFaithful wrote:
Doom wrote:
ForeverFaithful wrote:
Fr Amorth and Fr Ripperger have both called Harry Potter of the devil


Fr. Amorth was the Catholic Jack Chick, you'll need a more credible source than that.


Fr. Amorth was an active exorcist, if anyone going to know about demons, would it not be him?

The problem is (and this goes for Fr. Ripperger too) that when you devote yourself to fighting something, you tend to see it everywhere, even in places where it's not. There have been long-standing questions about Fr. Amorth's credibility, or at least his good judgment (see this and for example). I have seen things from Fr. Ripperger of late that I also find rather unlikely. I do not accuse either one of deliberate lies; I am afraid both got so close to their subject that they lost perspective.

Author:  ForeverFaithful [ Thu Sep 27, 2018 9:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:
The problem is (and this goes for Fr. Ripperger too) that when you devote yourself to fighting something, you tend to see it everywhere, even in places where it's not. There have been long-standing questions about Fr. Amorth's credibility, or at least his good judgment (see this and for example). I have seen things from Fr. Ripperger of late that I also find rather unlikely. I do not accuse either one of deliberate lies; I am afraid both got so close to their subject that they lost perspective.


That is certainly an excellent point. However, I don't think it is appropriate to call either Fr. Amorth or Fr. Ripperger (or Fr. Mendoza for that matter) the "Jack Chick" of Catholicism.

Author:  Smulkowski [ Fri Sep 28, 2018 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

In the Harry Potter books they celebrate Christmas.

Author:  Pro Ecclesia Dei [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 1:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Yes, it is of the Devil.

Proof: truth and beauty and good are convertible in being. Now objectively, Harry Potter is written in a less literate, more pedestrian way, thus lowering the quality and hence beauty of literature. And hence both its goodness and truth, but Satan is the father of all lies.



Honestly, it is evidence of a decrease in literacy whatever else may be said

Author:  ForeverFaithful [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

"Less literate, more pedestrian"

Less than what? More than what? It is a children's book after all.

Author:  Closet Catholic [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 4:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

ForeverFaithful wrote:
It is a children's book after all.
No, that's wrong. J.K. Rowling wants the reader to be roughly the age of Harry Potter when he reads the books. So the first book should be read by people aged 11 and older, the seventh book by people aged 17 and older.

Author:  Riverboat [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Doom wrote:
Fr. Amorth was the Catholic Jack Chick, you'll need a more credible source than that.

I wish I had seen this comment before reading his book. Buh-RUH-thuh!

Author:  Jack3 [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Pro Ecclesia Dei wrote:
Yes, it is of the Devil.

Proof: truth and beauty and good are convertible in being. Now objectively, Harry Potter is written in a less literate, more pedestrian way, thus lowering the quality and hence beauty of literature. And hence both its goodness and truth, but Satan is the father of all lies.



Honestly, it is evidence of a decrease in literacy whatever else may be said

Can you explain, please?

Author:  ForeverFaithful [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Closet Catholic wrote:
ForeverFaithful wrote:
It is a children's book after all.
No, that's wrong. J.K. Rowling wants the reader to be roughly the age of Harry Potter when he reads the books. So the first book should be read by people aged 11 and older, the seventh book by people aged 17 and older.

17 is still a minor even if it would be better to say "young adult"

The books are progressively more complex in their narrative and themes as well.

Author:  Pro Ecclesia Dei [ Sun Sep 30, 2018 11:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

ForeverFaithful wrote:
Closet Catholic wrote:
ForeverFaithful wrote:
It is a children's book after all.
No, that's wrong. J.K. Rowling wants the reader to be roughly the age of Harry Potter when he reads the books. So the first book should be read by people aged 11 and older, the seventh book by people aged 17 and older.

17 is still a minor even if it would be better to say "young adult"

The books are progressively more complex in their narrative and themes as well.

Compare it to "children's lit" of previous generations. I am anti young-adult, and "children lit" anyways, at least as the modern conception goes which just dumbs down reading in order to be more "relevant"

There are far better choices for that age. Rowling is an overrated hack that has assaulted the English tongue.

Author:  TreeBeard [ Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

I never thought of the "Harry Potter" as more than what is described here:

    They are modern fairy tales with predominant spiritual themes. They describe the struggle between good and evil and the ultimate triumph of the good through the courage and ingenuity of the human spirit, and the power of human love. The survival of the infant Harry against the onslaught of the evil Lord Voldemort that cost the lives of his parents, is repeatedly attributed to the power of his mother's love and her willingness to sacrifice her very life on the altar of this love....

    In each of the stories, Harry and his friends triumph over the evil Lord Voldemort through the spiritual power of goodness implanted in Harry, the strength of the powerful bond of friendship between Harry and the faithful Ron, the ingenuity and the problem-solving ability of the studious Hermione, and the courage of all of them combined.

Source. aish.com. Note: I did not read beyond the intro.

Author:  Jack3 [ Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Pro Ecclesia Dei wrote:
Compare it to "children's lit" of previous generations. I am anti young-adult, and "children lit" anyways, at least as the modern conception goes which just dumbs down reading in order to be more "relevant"

There are far better choices for that age. Rowling is an overrated hack that has assaulted the English tongue.


1. What are, in your opinion, the best English-language books for people 10-20 years old?
2. How has Rowling assaulted the English language?
3. Can poorly written books be judged for that reason to be of the devil?

Author:  Alexandros [ Mon Oct 01, 2018 7:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Fr. Ripperger's issue is that the series contains real curses/spells taken from actual witchcraft. If one can disprove it (or prove it?), then there you go. I have never looked into it, so I have no idea.

Author:  1HCaAC [ Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

TreeBeard wrote:
I never thought of the "Harry Potter" as more than what is described here:

    They are modern fairy tales with predominant spiritual themes. They describe the struggle between good and evil and the ultimate triumph of the good through the courage and ingenuity of the human spirit, and the power of human love. The survival of the infant Harry against the onslaught of the evil Lord Voldemort that cost the lives of his parents, is repeatedly attributed to the power of his mother's love and her willingness to sacrifice her very life on the altar of this love....

    In each of the stories, Harry and his friends triumph over the evil Lord Voldemort through the spiritual power of goodness implanted in Harry, the strength of the powerful bond of friendship between Harry and the faithful Ron, the ingenuity and the problem-solving ability of the studious Hermione, and the courage of all of them combined.

Source. aish.com. Note: I did not read beyond the intro.

Agree.

How can the triumph of good over evil be of Satan?

Author:  ForeverFaithful [ Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is Harry Potter of the Devil?

Alexandros wrote:
Fr. Ripperger's issue is that the series contains real curses/spells taken from actual witchcraft. If one can disprove it (or prove it?), then there you go. I have never looked into it, so I have no idea.


His proof is that a woman burned her house down with the spell in the book. That's not true. As I cited before, she was cooking with oil and toothpaste.

Page 2 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/