The Catholic Message Board
http://forums.avemariaradio.net/

Copyrighted images
http://forums.avemariaradio.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=143727
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Signum Crucis [ Wed May 02, 2012 8:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Copyrighted images

Please be careful about posting copyrighted images. We just received a demand to remove one from a thread about 6 months old. :roll:

Signum Crucis
Head Administrator

Author:  Peregrinator [ Wed May 02, 2012 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Was it an actual image or a link to one?

Author:  Signum Crucis [ Wed May 02, 2012 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

It was in a food thread in the Pub. People posted pictures of beer, pizza, etc. It was the spaghetti picture from some Scandinavian country that got tagged.

Author:  ellietrish [ Fri May 04, 2012 5:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

That Scandanavian must love his spagetti picture a lot to bother following it around like that. :shock: lolls

Author:  ellietrish [ Fri May 04, 2012 5:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Was this the guy?

Image

Author:  faithfulservant [ Fri May 04, 2012 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

isn't he a board member :scratch: :shock:

Author:  Teacher's Widow [ Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

I don't have to worry about mine. It dates to the 14th century. No copyrights there. :wave

Author:  John Ryan [ Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

The bloke in my signature and avatar is dead so.... :|

Author:  Closet Catholic [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

John Ryan wrote:
The bloke in my signature and avatar is dead so.... :|
The doesn't really make a difference. I assume he wasn't the photographer. And even if he was, the rule for copyright is either 70 years after the death of the creator (photographer, author, composer, songwriter, etc.) or 95 years after the publication, whichever is the longest.

Edit: I assume that the man in the picture is Derrida, who died in 2004.

Author:  Obi-Wan Kenobi [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Closet Catholic wrote:
John Ryan wrote:
The bloke in my signature and avatar is dead so.... :|
The doesn't really make a difference. I assume he wasn't the photographer. And even if he was, the rule for copyright is either 70 years after the death of the creator (photographer, author, composer, songwriter, etc.) or 95 years after the publication, whichever is the longest.

Not in the US.

Author:  Doom [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:
Closet Catholic wrote:
John Ryan wrote:
The bloke in my signature and avatar is dead so.... :|
The doesn't really make a difference. I assume he wasn't the photographer. And even if he was, the rule for copyright is either 70 years after the death of the creator (photographer, author, composer, songwriter, etc.) or 95 years after the publication, whichever is the longest.

Not in the US.


The citation he gave is practically a word for word citation from the Sonny Bono Act of 1998.

Author:  BlueyedMule [ Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Doom wrote:
Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:
Closet Catholic wrote:
John Ryan wrote:
The bloke in my signature and avatar is dead so.... :|
The doesn't really make a difference. I assume he wasn't the photographer. And even if he was, the rule for copyright is either 70 years after the death of the creator (photographer, author, composer, songwriter, etc.) or 95 years after the publication, whichever is the longest.

Not in the US.


The citation he gave is practically a word for word citation from the Sonny Bono Act of 1998.

"I got you babe"?

Author:  1HCaAC [ Fri Oct 26, 2018 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

Sonny and Cher?

Author:  RolandJS [ Sat Aug 03, 2019 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Copyrighted images

ellietrish wrote:
...to bother following it around like that...

I think the copyright holder, the trademark holder, the patent holder -- all those individuals are concerned about having their respective Idea/Product
-- being altered without permission
-- being used en mass by the masses

In reverse order, two quick examples come to mind:
Xerox probably lost their trademark to their name Xerox because it became a household word, and that household usage was not or could not be -- challenged by the trademark owner.
George Beverley Shea wrote the author of How Great Thou Art to get the author's permission to change two words. If memory serves me: words became worlds and mighty became rolling. A little grudgingly, however, permission was granted and the rest is history.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/